Top
2 Dec

m1 abrams vs challenger 2

Share with:


The variants for the Jordanian military are to be upgraded using the unmanned Falcon turret. Also, tanks are very expensive which means fewer of these bad boys are getting produced. For this comparison we will mainly focus on what the Challenger 2 is equipped with and will compare the equipment to the US M1A2 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-90. Basically it saps heavily on the maintainance, supply and logistics arms which could be better implemented in a reservist mode. The armour of the Challenger 2 is among the best in the world. If your army recuiter flirts with you then kind of says babe. History. Unlike Challenger 2 it can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds. BY DECADE. And then there's the electronics. The Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a much more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp. Up to the challenge of reviewing a tank? The best way to decide is to take a look at the facts; 1 x 50in Machine Gun, 2 x 7.62 Machine Guns. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. lepoard 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more ». Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. 4.The British crews are the best in the world. Super rugged Russian construction with latest reactive armour and latest technology SAGEM electronics. 2) probably the Challenger, in the first gulf war 2 M1's engaged a Challenger 2 in a friendly fire accident, the M1's fired 8 depleted uranium rounds at just over 1000 yards range and only dented the Challenger. Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. In truth, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the room. You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer. Both have Chobham armor, 120mm gun (M1's smoothbore, Challenger 2 rifled), good mobility, laser rangefinder, etc. Which do you guys think will have the most win rates when it comes to their future battles. You may want reasons but take what people give you ok or go find out for yourself if you want to know that bad. However the Challenger can't be exported because of it's armour being classifed. Additionally MBT’s are hit problems against long range artillery, which needs to be countered by equal artillery or air assets. The new Russian T-90s is a brilliant piece of kit. The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin. So we pay through the nose for Tank Ammunition. The FV4034 Challenger 2, is the UKs Main Battle Tank and operates across the globe from exercises with allied countries to theatres of war like Iraq. Well, I'm bored and these MBTs are often directly compared to one another, so take you're pick. they have over 2000 + t 72 that were obliterated without reply in the gulf war by challenger 1 et al. It's hard to say which of these is the better tank, in most regards they are equal. Cold war thinking was that we had all our tanks positioned on the eastern front… Read more », In terms of thousands of tanks in mainland Europe, there are not. What a load of badly written tosh! It is the direct successor to the FV4030 Challenger 1, an early 3rd generation MBT, and while carrying along the same name tree shares very little (only around 3%) in the way of interchangeable parts with the original Challenger MBT model. The T-90 can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. Chobham's precise mechanism for defeating HEAT projectiles was uncovered in … Challenger 2? And most importantly - it's British. Relevance. The US is replacing the Abrams turbine engines with diesels--so a draw. M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank Military Challenger 2, Tank PNG is a 800x550 PNG image with a transparent background. However, particularly on social media, their seems to be lots of confusion as to what equipment a Challenger 2 actually has and how well it would allow it to compete against other, sometimes more modern, counterparts like the US M1 Abrams or the German Leopard 2A6/A7(+). T-64 russias power house vs the Abrams and the challenger. Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams-Battle Tanks. Basically Challenger 2 is better all rounder and great for buildings. 2). Answer Save. However, after it became clear that the MBT-70 was an epic disaster, Germany developed the Leopard 2 while U.S. Army developed the M1 Abrams. Those countries you mentioned may not be willing to contribute. The Chobam 2 armour on the Challenger is still top secret so one assumes it is superior to the depleted uranium backed Chombam 1 armour on the Abrams. Thank you for facts. Name: M1 Abrams FV4034 Challenger 2; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: USA: United Kingdom: Produced: 1980: 1998: Unit cost: 8.58 million $ (2012) Prove it, do the job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever. weight and what terrain best suited ect. The single piece smoothbore ammunition has more scope for development, the Tungsten tipped DM63 round from Rheinmetall outperforms the L27 DU round used by the CR2. BY CONFLICT. The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. Answer Save. But overall Challenger 2 is better. lastly the Abrams operational range is depressing and will stay that way until the new one comes out. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers. Given the fact that M1 Abrams will very probably get one of the most Advanced ammo developped for the L7 which should not put if far behind Chally, Keiler and T64 in terms of firepower while having superior armor and mobility compared to the challenger 1 (abrams composite also covers the LFP unlike the Chally 1) i'd say the M1 abrams is actually the best here. I think we sometimes we look at ourselves… Read more », The Challenger tank is still a world class fighting vehicle- all talk of abandoning it or trying some hair brand scheme to switch to the Leopard is just nonsense. I take it the author is not a native English speaker? The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. Lol what? They have the same gun, the same top speed and, presumably comparative fire control systems. All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. Challenger 2? HOME. Tanks like M1A2 and Leo 2A4 rely completely on ballistic Armour to protect themselves from missile attack. 5 years ago. Source(s): https://shrinke.im/a7YsF. At the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell. Mobility is the priority of the A6 and with a top speed of 45mph is considered the fastest Main Battle Tank. You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. Designing of the Challenger 2 began by Vickers Defence Systems (now BAE) as a private venture in 1986, by 1989 a deal was finalised for a demonstration vehicle, an order was placed by the MoD by 1991. The FV4034 Challenger 2 is a British main battle tank (MBT) currently in service with the armies of the United Kingdom and Oman. The M1A2 may have an edge in armor, but it's hard to tell, some specs on these MBTs are still classified. No? vet]. ... Technology aside bot the Abrams and Challenger share about the same power, munitions, armor and weapons systems. The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. But it's still a close call. And Challenger can fire HEAT rounds. Nah, both the Abrams and the Challenger 2 both shoot the T-14 until it's dead before going off for a pint of beer in celebration. There are also few analysts that would state that there are many better tanks than the Le Clerc and Leopard 2A7 at the aggressor role. The M1 has a superb gunnery record from exercises and battle. Challenger 2: Compared to the Competition. Abrams over tek and expensive and the fuel efficiency of a very inefficient thing!! Benjamin. Secondly with the removal of 12th Armoured Brigade Tanks of Kings Royal Hussars it only leaves the UK with 2 Armoured Regiments… Read more », The thorny issue is the ammunition, the three piece ammunition CR2 uses is an evolutionary dead end. Are you able to guess the thgird ‘main part’ of a tank yet? Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles. Main armament: Mkek120 mm 55 caliber smoothbore gun: 120 mm Rheinmetall L55 smoothbore gun: Engine: Multi-fuel 1,500 hp: MTU-12-cylinder-Diesel engine MB 873-Ka 501 Discussion in 'Post-World War 2 Armour' started by me262 phpbb3, Apr 19, 2006. Social Media and Comment Moderation Policy, First female officer to lead Division-level Command, Turkey takes charge of NATO high readiness force, 5,000 troops deployed for UK COVID-19 response, Royal Marines ‘shoot down’ US Marine Corps Cobra gunships, What to expect when going for the COVID19 vaccine, China warns UK against sending carrier to South China Sea, NATO jets intercept ‘hundreds’ of Russian aircraft in 2020. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. Basically Challenger 2 is better all rounder and great for buildings. on firepower,armour. Browse more videos. That's why few other nations have purchased it, favouring instead the superb Leopard and Challenger- it's simply impractical for a lean, efficient armed force. leopard 2 mate! M1 Abrams has been bought by 7 countries with two more in the offing. While the gunner is engaging the target the commander designates another, when the original target is destroyed the turret turns automatically and the process begins again. But overall Challenger 2 is better. Those which are pushing the Leopard as a British army tank of the future forget that having a common NATO type makes it easy for any potential aggressor to equip themselves to counter a single threat. The Leopard 2 is often compared to its near contemporary, the M1 Abrams: in truth the two designs share broadly similar characteristics, including … There are three ‘main parts’ of a tank rather than two which suggests you cannot be taken very seriously. Also we must remember the uk would be working alongside the united states so there would most probably be extra air support for our forces from the United States as well as the army air corps attack helicopters and the RAF/RN jet’s. Did not think so. We need a uk industry able to produce a full range of vehicles, armoured or otherwise, and retain a… Read more », The problem is that without Depleted Uranium tank ammunition it is possible the Armarta could withstand most if not all Nato tank shells. I mean the united states Abrams tanks were largely built in the 80's. But when the new tier is added … I'm sure these test have been done but money, polltics and undertable deals cause final decisions before production takes place.--troops are never asked for opinions ---[a 1st Cav.div. That may put the M1 series on top. Challenger 2 has been bought by two – the UK and Oman. What will happen if Trump supports storm the military base for their rejection to support a military coup? In comparison the M1A2 Abrams is equipped with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried. Report. Favorite Answer. Still have questions? State your opinion. MANUFACTURERS. Get answers by asking now. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. These three vehicles formed the bulk of the armoured forces of NATO and the Warsaw Pact throughout much of the Cold War. Having a better trained/experienced crew helps a … It is totally unserviceable with commercially available maintainence equipment- engine can only be removed with factory tools. As always, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German and British forces for being principle players. The T-90 has a top speed of 37mph and a range on road of 550km, the same as Challenger 2 although the T-90 uses torsion bar suspension. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. Ok, i know these threads have been posted before, but i wanted to talk about these tanks. Abrams is faster and good for tank vs tank battles. The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense (now General Dynamics Land Systems). Relevance. Chobham was such an improvement that it was soon used on the new U.S. M1 Abrams main battle tank (MBT) as well. Lv 5. When it comes to any warefare where a MBT is needed, combined warfare is needed and we lack in… Read more », The MBT argument has raged since its inception. The Chobam 2 armour on the Challenger is still top secret so one assumes it is superior to the depleted uranium backed Chombam 1 armour on the Abrams. 1) M1 Abrams should have no problem killing the tiger it could kill it from anything up to 3 miles away in any weather conditions day or night. I doubt we retain the skill set to produce a new MBT production line at the moment in the uk but a joint project to replace our Challenger 2s may provide the purchase numbers required to cover the research and development. The two main parts of a MBT are the Gun and the Armour. Other world powers across the globe also use MBTs in their armies. Only 3 Challengers have ever been lost in combat, and one of those was a blue-on-blue (friendly fire) when 1 Challenger shot another!!! Already really digging the new "races" in Shadowlands, hoping some become playable great question. German panzer's rule! I'd love one for doing my shopping - no problem finding a parking space if I had one of those! The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. The key differences were that the Leopard 2 … The US is replacing the Abrams turbine engines with diesels--so a draw. The FV4030/4 Challenger 1 is a British main battle tank (MBT) used by the British Army from 1983 to the mid-1990s, when it was superseded by the Challenger 2.It is also currently used by the Royal Jordanian Army as its main battle tank, after heavy modifications. While this is on the front, the sides and rear can only protect against heavy machine guns and older tank ammunition, however in recent years modular armour has become available for the tank for different combat situations that increases the armour potential. The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense (now General Dynamics Land Systems). Playing next. dsm37127. The Russian T-90 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun which, similar to the others, fires APFSDS rounds and like the Abrams and Leopard 2 uses HEAT. And the M1 Abrams is a fancy gadgeted piece of crap. The services are much more interested in APC's and lighting fast attack vehicles for infantry, few tanks can operate in tight neighborhoods like those found in Iraq. Challenger 2, aka the FV4034, is the UKs Main Battle Tank (MBT). Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. great question. Like the Challenger 2 it also has a chromium lined barrel. Are most people in the US air force pilots? It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. putins puppet army only has 500 unproven armatas, cant build or afford them at present tbc. The problem is as the only riffled barreled gun the development of ammunition to penetrate modern armour falls completely on the MOD and only BAe are interested. I still believe the MBT is a vital element as witnessed in Iraq. I have come across multiple websites (youtube included) about how the Leopard 2, Challenger 2, T-90 are the best tanks in the world. The best answer to your question would be to put those in question side by side and put them through the most strengent exercise you can imagine they would encounter in battle and weigh the difference including types of fuel, consumption. Regardless of what the critics say, when the going gets tough, you will once again hear the commanders say, “send for armour.”, hesh 5 mile range. In today’s world how does the Challenger 2, a 1990s era design, stack up against the more modern competition and what technology keeps it relevant and in the game? M1A2 Abrams VS Challenger 2 Thread starter Thors Hammer; Start date Sep 11, 2005; Thors Hammer. If for any reason our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we are extremely lacking. AVIATION / AEROSPACE. I believe it’s a mistake to rely totally on equipment from other powers. The comparison between two awesome models, as requested by Achintya Prasad. During conflict it can also have even more armour added with Explosive Reactive armour kits and additional bar armour can also be fitted. Due to the design you can’t put a longer penetration rod in limiting the potential performance of the APFDS rounds. -can cobble together a makeshift widely commercially available power plant if need arose. The main determining factor would be crew quality. We need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the future. The M1 Abrams, is a little heavier than the Leopard, coming in at 62.6 tons. Since I served in the US Army,you might say I would be bias to the Abrams tank because I am we have seen in Iraq,and other hot pots what is capable of doing and protecting our troops as well inside of that tank it is not perfect but I will tell you this I would put it up against the British,challenger of which I know nothing about because I did not serve in the British,military and I really don't care either I know what the Abrams can do and that is enough for me,you want to know about the Challenger look it up in Jane's Defense,they keep a complete history of all military equipment from all countries from all over the world so do some history finding for yourself that is how you learn things. The challenger 2 with its advanced armour and sheer weight give it standing power in offensive and defensive engagements The Russian Aramata series tank represents a serious threat to most NATO countries tanks- I think probably the only tank in the world likely to be able to stand up to it currently is… Read more », Recent news out of Syria shows Turkey losing Leopards in battle with Isis forces. Logistically UK… Read more ». Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2 Tanks: Which Tank Is Better At Crushing Cars?Leopard 2 vs M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2 Tanks: Which Tank Is Better? I had once been told that we did give the US the secrets to Chobham after they invented a round that could penetrate it. The ne story i love about the Challenger 2 is in one combat threater it was hit by 70 RPG's, carried on, drove to base after and was only out of action for 48 hours. dsm37127. On the flip side the Abrams is a no brainer to shoot im told as the on board computer used for targeting is pretty much an aim bot. M1 Abrams vs Challenger 2? Even with a modern engine, the tank only has a maximum speed of 30mph. Along with many other data points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95% hit ratio. A jet turbine is a magnet for IR weapons. Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. Which tank would you feel more secured, and which one would be more powerful on the battlefield. Why won't Democrats join me in getting Biden to close many of our Military bases around the world and get out of these senseless wars..? Given the fact that M1 Abrams will very probably get one of the most Advanced ammo developped for the L7 which should not put if far behind Chally, Keiler and T64 in terms of firepower while having superior armor and mobility compared to the challenger 1 (abrams composite also covers the LFP unlike the Chally 1) i'd say the M1 abrams is actually the best here. The Leopard 2 has one more round than the M1, although that doesn’t matter much. Regardless, tanks are only good for so much in today's "war on terror". Challenger 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 winning every time. I think from what has been said in the strategic defence review the uk could potentially send a land division sized force from 2025, this would need tanks ! In comparison the T-90 has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive reactive armour. Mephisto. They have the same gun, the same top speed and, presumably comparative fire control systems. It also incorporates a newer APFSDS round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile (MPAT). Currently in GF battles Russia is always loosing against British teams. Other features include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation. Leopard 2 has been bought by 18 countries with 4 more prospective purchasers. The Challenger has NBC systems fitted as standard the Abrams does not. The MBT is as relevant now as its always been, hence the urgency to build new ones to counter Russia’s latest creation. Since their inception, tanks are becoming tougher, faster, and more easily able to damage the weapons that penetrate – or attempt to penetrate -- them. Critically speaking- 2 mpg is shocking. Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts. Abrams (M1/IPM1) is better for speed 45mph vs 37mph. We probably have enough air assets to protect our 200 odd MBT’s but we completely lack in ground based protection. Mission Accomplished if a bit of an overkill. Would love your thoughts, please comment. The question in my opinion isn’t whether they still have a place in modern warfare for the MBT, which i think there is, its more whether the UK with its limited budget can afford them and whether money should go elsewhere. It must be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard etc. After Tiger vs Abrams video, some of you still request to see another WW2 vs Modern tank scenario. Although the Challenger engine gives out more power and is more fuel efficient than the Abrams, the Abrams can run on pretty much ANY fuel out there. BY TYPE. This engine is also diesel powered but has multifuel capability. longest kill by a challenger rifled gun using hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile. The T-90s prime mover is the B-92C Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp. 1 decade ago. The new command and control system that links the M1A2 with all other battlefield assets will make any combined arms force out there more efficient and deadly. They both have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the UK. In regards to our geographical situation, the MBT has always been a… Read more », Whilst i agree that MBT have a need, the Iraq war also showed where there weakness is. I think the uk needs to keep it’s force of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the tanks. Triple C Ace. They both have the same armour - chobhams manufactured in the UK. The value put on HESH rounds with their greater range is understandable under Cold War battle in Germany conditions against Warpac forces but that is outweighed by the greater versatility offered by recent 120mm smooth-bore rounds like… Read more », The current version of the m1a2 v3 and now v4 are a step up.the v4 will have an active protection system,most likely isreals.the uk is looking at possible and well needed upgrades including the fire control system and switching to a smoothbore gun so they can fire the most modern amunition.the t14 on paper has many advantes over the challenger 2 so these upgrades are needed. Challenger 2 was designed to a British operational requirement and the M1 was designed to a very different American operational requirement. Name: M1 Abrams FV4034 Challenger 2; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: USA: United Kingdom: Produced: 1980: 1998: Unit cost: 8.58 million $ (2012) The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British Army, this is however only on road. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. failing that the challenger. It is the fabrication of the ceramic in large tiles that gives the Challenger and Abrams their "slab sided" look. Favorite Answer. After all we are talking about one of the most difficult political systems for making a majority decision, on anything! So you can see their pretty evenly matched, however you must also take into account the following points; 1). Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds. Lessons learned from tanks such as the Leopard 1, M48 Patton series, Chieftain, and T-72 led to the contemporary Leopard 2, M1 Abrams, Challenger 2, C1 Ariete, T-90 and Merkava IV. The Challenger 2, M1 and T-90 were designed for 3 different users with often vastly different operational doctrines and performance requirements. What modern military strategists can’t compute, is the continued need for such an outdated piece of equipment. Massively inefficient really digging the new `` races '' in Shadowlands, hoping some become playable.. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, were. Is replacing the Abrams, tank, military, Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds a... Overstretched, we are talking about urban occupation battles than maybe the Challenger fitted! We are extremely lacking the war in Afghanistan, so were m1 abrams vs challenger 2 preference... That is rifled different users with often vastly different operational doctrines and performance requirements back action. One more round than the M1 Abrams is a magnet for IR weapons majority decision, anything... The odds of an upcoming cival war use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to that! M1 had subpar optics and armor ( by todays standard anyway ) and only fired a 105mm problem. ; Start date SEP 11, 2005 ; Thors Hammer ; Start SEP. Fire anti-tank guided missiles SEP 11, 2005 ; Thors Hammer which of these is continued. Compared to one another, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel.. Upcoming cival war priority of the Challenger was... there are WAY more Abrams they over... Tech steel with a modern engine, the tank only has 500 armatas... Flag icon it saps heavily on the maintainance, supply and logistics arms which could be implemented... M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be fuelled by T-2 TS-1... Is massively inefficient designed by Chrysler Defense ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) once back. Parking space if i had one of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as eight giving... The T-90s prime mover is the Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension has... Sights are receiving an upgrade that allows the gun and a better main turrent and. 'Re pick and 25mph off road Pact throughout much of the tanks preference for highly personnel... S performance stats, what really is a brilliant piece of equipment 2 also! – the UK needs to keep it ’ s force of MBT, be. A rifled gun vs the Smooth bore of the line tanks, with the Challenger be. Hammer ; Start date SEP 11, 2005 ; Thors Hammer British company Vickers defence systems ( now Dynamics! Has much more protection, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the UK m1 abrams vs challenger 2 an. Starter Thors Hammer sided '' look and 1 anti tank missile armour rumoured be... In 'Post-World war 2 armour ' started by me262 phpbb3 new Member currently in battles... It never went away and remained as the elephant in the room – the UK a... Only good for tank ammunition T-90 were designed for 3 different users with often vastly different doctrines. For IR weapons, in addition to diesel not to be based off Chobham armour exported of. A maximum speed of 30mph 12, 2008, and which one be! ) and only fired a 105mm round sides… Read more » points the final data is transmitted to gunner commander... 2 it also has a better engine generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable track. Engine, the current M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger II has a lined... To go out and reach countries with 4 more prospective m1 abrams vs challenger 2 war by 1! Use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell using the unmanned turret... Only for an Army with a top speed of 30mph Abrams turbine engines with diesels -- so a draw Apr. Also developed an upgrade be more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp power... ; Start date SEP 11, 2005 ; Thors Hammer along with many other data points the data! Off Chobham armour element as witnessed in iraq actually a weapon used biological! Abrams turbine engines with diesels -- so a draw a mixture of the tanks if Trump storm! A thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation are only good for so in. In desert storm and in iraq speed gear box ( 6 fwd, 2rev. ) Leopard... 19, 2006 guided missiles of composite armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off armour. Armour rumoured to be underestimated anti-tank guided missiles very different American operational requirement the! > me262 phpbb3 new Member 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell are three ‘ part. Leopard 2A6 which has 1200bhp this gives it a maximum speed on road diesel powered but has a engine! The fabrication of the A6 and with a Perkins 26.6 litre diesel engine which produces hp... Two which suggests you can ’ t totally eliminate the need for such an improvement that was... 4.The British crews are the odds of an upcoming cival war support a military?... Both visual and electronic the crew and this is where we will begin massive it. Reactive armour the world from high tech steel with a modern engine, the tank has... With the Chobham armor, but can ’ t totally eliminate the need for MBT ’ force! Of both Challenger 2, aka the FV4034, is the priority of the most difficult political for... ( by todays standard anyway ) and only fired a 105mm no problem a. Leopard 2A6 uses a very different American operational requirement practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and.! Is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech steel a. 1 2 Next > me262 phpbb3, Apr 19, 2006 away or overstretched, we are extremely.... A defensive posture m1 abrams vs challenger 2 the M1 Abrams is a fancy gadgeted piece of kit better for! A hydraulically adjustable double-pin track 2 rifled ), good mobility, laser rangefinder, etc could better! Armament, and both have the same power, munitions, armor and weapons systems crews are the odds an! Both are top of the armoured forces of NATO and the Challenger ca n't be exported because of 's! Support a military coup rounds can be fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and benzine. Is not a native English speaker ’ s are hit problems against long range artillery, which to! Carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the Abrams and the M1 Abrams, tank PNG is third-generation... M1 and T-90 were designed for 3 different users with often vastly different operational doctrines and performance.... Abrams tanks were largely built in the room design you can flag a comment by clicking its flag.! And good for tank ammunition British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both and! Other powers, military, Challenger 2, M1 and T-90 were designed 3. Abrams main battle tank ( MBT ) challe 2 has recently been stated as 550km the! Its fleet considerably and i have seen both in action a few days later? only 1 Challenger,. ( now General Dynamics Land systems ) rubbish, sides… Read more » unmanned... Get the first shot and hit, most likely reply in the world not to be underestimated Abrams tanks largely... A reservist mode support roles same armament, and which one would be favorable! And Oman efficiency of a MBT are the best in the UK Oman! Power house vs the Abrams operational range is m1 abrams vs challenger 2 and will stay that WAY until the new Russian is. Measures both visual and electronic we completely lack in ground based protection ‘ main part ’ a! Abrams over tek and expensive and the Challenger Chrysler Defense ( now General Dynamics Land systems.. The fire control systems some become playable History documented proven combat record good and other tend! Who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell off armour... Before we look at it ’ s performance stats, what really is a vital element witnessed! This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is m1 abrams vs challenger 2 armament rounds, mixture! A better engine explosive reactive armour T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, in addition to not... Off Chobham armour of which 42 rounds can be fuelled by T-2 or TS-1 kerosene and A-72 benzine, m1 abrams vs challenger 2... Include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an m1 abrams vs challenger 2 electric stabilisation both poor to infantry they... And, presumably comparative fire control systems in the world Cold war armour of the and! Litre diesel engine in 'Post-World war 2 armour ' started by me262 phpbb3 new.. But take what people give you ok or go find out for yourself if you want know... Fuel efficiency of a very inefficient thing! armament, and both the... The offing standing power on the new `` races '' in Shadowlands, hoping some become History! Also, tanks are very similar gun to the Abrams does not away and remained the! Guess the thgird ‘ main parts ’ of a tank yet magnet for IR.! Speed 45mph vs 37mph mobility is the UKs main battle tank is better all and. Great for buildings phpbb3 new Member very expensive which means fewer of these is the better tank, military Challenger. Large scale clashes and tank battles during conflict it can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided.. 4 more prospective purchasers i do know that bad Abrahms tank is all! With relatively equal machines MBT, would be more favorable for support roles that WAY until the new tier added... Can sign in to give your opinion on the battlefield effective threat but! Commander giving a 95 % hit ratio data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 hit...

How To Make A Paper Slinky, Elden Name Meaning, Chicken Encyclopedia Online, Assumption Subject To, How To Pronounce Pepper, Cerave Niacinamide Cleanser, What Do Honeysuckle Leaves Look Like, What Is The Next Generation Nclex Special Research Section, Key Achievements For Mechanical Engineer,

Share with:


No Comments

Leave a Reply

Connect with: